Scorecard Visualization¶
Interactive visualization of human rights indicators across 194 countries.
Quick Overview¶
-
194 Countries
Countries represented in the published research snapshot
-
10 Indicators
AI Policy, Data Protection, LGBTQ+ Status, Child Protection, and more
-
132 Fully Documented
Countries with written justifications for all ten scored indicators
-
26 June 2026
Snapshot generated; source-verification stamp: 9 September 2025
Accessing Data¶
Interactive Visualizations¶
Explore the scorecard interactively below. Charts are rendered in your browser from a published static dataset — no server required. To filter, search, sort, and compare individual countries, use the Data Explorer.
Use the country table instead Download the published snapshot
Click a country on the map for its full indicator breakdown and sources.
About this data
Visualizations are generated from the project's designated visualization dataset and are point-in-time. Source-URL verification is an ongoing, separate workflow, so figures may be revised. The canonical pipeline data lives in scorecard_main.xlsx. See Data Access for the API and CSV exports.
Indicators Tracked¶
Scoring System
Each indicator uses a 0-1-2 scale where higher scores indicate stronger protections:
- 2 (Best) - Comprehensive protections or safeguards in place
- 1 (Middle) - Partial protections or mixed implementation
- 0 (Worst) - No protections, harmful policies, or heightened risk
Risk analysis examines combinations of indicators (e.g., LGBTQ criminalization × biometric ID linkage).
The scorecard tracks 10 indicators spanning data protection, child online safety, LGBTQ+ rights, AI policy, and digital identification. The full definition, sources, and per-category (0/½) rubric for every indicator live on the Scorecard Design & Methodology page.
Composite Scores¶
In addition to the 10 individual indicators, the scorecard calculates composite metrics:
Protection Score¶
Formula: Sum of all 10 indicator scores (0–20 scale)
- Maximum: 20 (all indicators score 2)
- Minimum: 0 (all indicators score 0)
- Interpretation: Higher scores indicate stronger digital rights protections
Example: Country with 7 indicators at (2), 2 at (1), 1 at (0) = 14 + 2 + 0 = 16 Protection Score
Risk Index¶
Formula: 100 − (Protection_Score / 20 × 100)
- Maximum: 100 (no protections, highest risk)
- Minimum: 0 (full protections, lowest risk)
- Interpretation: Inverted scale where higher values indicate greater risk
Example: Protection Score of 16 → Risk Index = 100 − (16/20 × 100) = 100 − 80 = 20
Data Completeness¶
Formula: (Indicators with written justifications / 10) × 100
- Maximum: 100% (all 10 indicators have data)
- Minimum: 0% (no indicator data available)
- Interpretation: Percentage of indicators with written justifications in the published visualization snapshot
Use the completeness measure to identify countries where more source research is needed before comparison.
Exporting Data¶
Via self-hosted REST API or CSV¶
Start your own instance using the API Quick Start. The API queries local pipeline inputs; the downloadable browser snapshot is a separate scored output.
Access scorecard data programmatically (REST API) or as CSV exports — every method, with copy-paste examples in cURL / Python / R, is documented on the Data Access page.
From the Pipeline¶
Run the scorecard export workflow:
The standard export generates scorecard_summary.csv, scorecard_sources.csv and scorecard_indicator_counts.csv. Regional and individual-indicator exports are separate operations.
CSV Format¶
scorecard_summary.csv:
| Country | AI_Policy_Status | Data_Protection_Law | LGBTQ_Legal_Status | ... |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenya | Framework | Comprehensive Law | No Protections | ... |
| South Africa | Strategy | Comprehensive Law | Some Protections | ... |
scorecard_sources.csv:
| country | indicator | url |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | AI_Policy_Status | Source URL extracted from the workbook |
Data Explorer¶
Want to filter by region or indicator, search for a country, sort the full table, or compare countries side-by-side?
Validation & Quality¶
URL Validation¶
Run URL checks on the pipeline source register:
Generates validation_report.csv with:
- HTTP status codes
- Redirect chains
- Broken links
- Response times
Change Detection¶
Monitor sources for updates:
Detects:
- Content changes (via hashing)
- Page changes requiring policy review
- Broken links
- Changed access or content requiring review
Data Quality¶
Authoritative Sources:
- UNESCO - AI policies and digital education
- UNCTAD - Data protection legislation
- ILGA World - LGBTQ+ legal status
- UNICEF - Child protection measures
- ITU - Telecom regulations
- Privacy International - Surveillance measures
Updating assessments:
Source checks and content comparisons identify material for review. Changes to an assessment are recorded with the supporting source and date.
Updating an assessment¶
Record the country, indicator, existing value, proposed correction and source. After reviewing the evidence, update the workbook and regenerate the exports using the Scorecard Workflow.
Data Governance explains how sources and revisions are recorded.
Citing Scorecard Data¶
Identify LittleRainbowRights Scorecard, the snapshot generation date (26 June 2026), your access date and the particular assessments used. Record the 9 September 2025 source-verification stamp when discussing evidence freshness. Link to the published downloads and relevant original sources.
Cite DigitalChild v2.1.0 separately for the software.
Reading the assessments¶
The scorecard compares documented laws and policy frameworks using a three-point scale. Read the country assessments alongside their original sources, with attention to:
- Dates: the snapshot was generated on 26 June 2026; the source-verification stamp is 9 September 2025.
- Coverage: written justifications and accessible sources vary across countries and indicators.
- Context: enforcement, local experience and differences within federal systems add detail beyond a national comparison.
- Relationships: indicators such as criminalization and biometric identification may interact in ways that merit closer study.
Design & Methodology explains the scoring rules and analytical scope. Include the snapshot date and relevant sources when citing an assessment.
Future Enhancements¶
Planned features (see Roadmap):
- Interactive choropleth map, indicator & regional charts ✅ LIVE (Plotly.js, this page)
- Country comparison tool ✅ LIVE (radar comparison in the Data Explorer)
- Time-series tracking of policy changes
- API for programmatic access ✅ COMPLETE (12 endpoints implemented for self-hosting, see API docs)
- Real-time source monitoring alerts
- Expanded indicators (15-20 total)
- Sub-national data (states/provinces)
Technical Details¶
For technical documentation:
- Scorecard Workflow Guide - Complete system overview
- Metadata Schema - Data structure
- Architecture - System design
Further guidance¶
Methodology · Data access · FAQ
Software development is recorded in the repository and roadmap.